Applying Theory Essay

Healthy aging is positively gibe with cover upd psychological and social participation of elder citizens with activities that may non be very similar to those that they shake off been used to, but substitutes them to acknowledge their age and limited capabilities. twist a aged citizens meaning would all(prenominal)ow them to participate in modified activities that they deal pursued in middle age. The association would be creating a venue by which the time-worn could get educational training, physical and leisure activities suited to their age to burn boredom.The half direction would encourage them to stay active, less depressed about aging. In the long-term, the concenter would promote a positive well-being among the elderly. Exchange speculation Building a senior(a) citizens center would improvement the senior citizens in many ways but on the part of the alliance, the signifierulate would have benefits as well as incur costs. A center would provide senior citi zens a productive gist by which to throw off their loneliness years. It would raise them more active and social than they would if they obviously communicate most of their time at home or a retirement home.On the part of the biotic fraternity, the monetary cost of the project might fall upon it impractical if the amount could be better spent in a much more needed club project. Then again, the elderly is as much a part of the community as much as the younger members and constructing a center would provide a psychological benefit for both age groups. To the elderly, a center is a reassurance that the community value them in spite their old age. To the younger generation, the center equally reassures them that they atomic number 18 doing something right for the elderly.Functionalism Every age group necessitate to belong to an governing body which would foster a smell of their membership in the larger community. Furthermore, to become as a whole, all members should work t ogether and slip into roles aimed towards fulfilling the needs of society. A senior citizens center would make the retirees a moxie of belonging in the community as it would serve as their ecesis now that they have lost membership in their former work blank spaces. They would form into a social group which could organize activities to benefit the entire community.It would make the cohesion of the community stronger as an organized group of senior citizens means that even the elderly ar contributing towards the stability and constant action of the community, factors which characterize a healthy, working community. Continuity Theory Senior citizens would continue to seek for the same activities, relationships and lifestyles they had in younger years. A senior citizens center would be a good way by which the elderly members of society can organize, assemble and socializejust like when they were younger.Since they all belong to the same age group, members would develop a distinct g loss and this would give everyone a sense of stability and accept system. A center with activities and programs ge ared for the elderly would help ease the difficulties of adjusting to old age. The community, in turn, would have less of the stereotyped bitter and bad-tempered elderly members because it has a place which helps the elderly experience aging as a positive, supportive and gently-sloping experience.Theories that would palisade against the senior citizens center. Conflict Theory Building a senior citizens center would benefit the elderly, however it would acknowledge their continued worth in society and their influence in terms of policy-making. The senior citizens have passed their prime, and the younger generation controls public administration including the budget and planning. The latter would pass up the spending of $3M for a center that would not be advantageous to the community.The community could maximize its spending by allocating the budget for other project s and simply stupefy the care of the elderly under their respective families or elderly homes. This way the family or home would be spending only for the necessary expenses to support the survival needs of the elderly without funneling the communitys financial resources. policy-making economy of aging The corporate interest precedes personal interest of the market. A senior citizens center would surely not justify the $3M that the community would be spending towards constructing and running it.A center for the elderly would simply be a place for them to engage in pursuits like physical activities, entertainment, seminars conducted by volunteers and other non-profitable, self-serving endeavors. If the aim is to spend the money in a project that would benefit the aging population, a wiser idea would be to revert the funds towards the construction of a managed care institution. To be profitable in the long run, this institution could give the elderly the same run and activities as t he proposed center, but at certain prices.Recreation for the elderly should be a privilege instead of a charitable act. Disengagement supposition The elderly and society engage in mutual separation. A senior citizens center is impractical because it would mean integrating the elderly into the community when they should realize that they have to withdraw from social activities they have been used to prior to retirement. A center would give the elderly a false sense of importance regarding their role in the community.It would pose a burden to the community which has to constantly bear with the expenses incurred by the center and its useless programs. The elderly cannot anymore contribute to society and compete with its standards of excellence therefore, for the benefit of society, they should interact with the community and with each other less. Social Competence/Breakdown Theory Building a senior citizens center would create greater addiction on the part of the already vulnerable senior citizens.If the center is agnise the elderly would feel self-important, ask for extra services and special privileges. If the demands are refused, it would cause emotional distress. To show sensitivity to the elderly, they should be allowed to face the challenges in life, without spending $3M to build a center especially for them. They should not be doled out with charity. They should be left to find the means to be blissful and productive in their late years. The community would be doing them well if they are made to feel like they have worked hard to accomplish something.