Persuading on Genetically Modified Food Essay

The denomination c everyed contagiousally special Foods, has a style that is use to grab an reference sense while still putting several(prenominal) facts. Right away in the first dissever you go away find ethos. Per Pinstrup-Anderson plays a key eccentric in the article, he is the H. E. Babcock Professor of Food, Nutrition and Public Policy at Cornell University. Giving Per Pinstrup-Anderson a creditability, and having the audience attention. This is the only time in the article when ethos is being used to armed service their argument.In the succeeding(prenominal) dickens paragraphs, compassion and logos be used. It shows some facts as well as getting into the audience emotion. The way this was done was by talking ab go forth part farmers in developing countries produce to a greater extent nutrient, make it more(prenominal) inexpensive to buy food, as well as non harming the environment. It goes on to say, legion(predicate) millions of people do not have access to sufficient calories and some more suffer from micronutrient deficiencies. Another quote is, which avoided mass starvation and inspection and repaired millions out of poverty and hunger. nonice they never gave an little statistic on how legion(predicate) people are suffering from poverty and hunger, letting the audience imagine that it is so some(prenominal) people affected, and not just a item number. It gives it more of a feel then would be given an exact number. In the next paragraph it goes back to logos, in the paragraph it is say science is the answer to fixing the hunger. It describes action that must be taken an society to be able to start helping starving people, as well as how will science help farming, like drouth tolerance, mitigation of negative climate change, and pest resistance in crops.Those are just a few of what the paragraph claims to be able to do with a little investment for the technology. The way this paragraph is phrase is by letting the audiences expect the processes that have to be done in order for an action to start. That way the audiences may start to have an opinion. At the repeal of this article it starts to talk active how long test must be done, and how the longer we wait the more expensive food will be as well as leaving millions to die. This modulation is using compassion for its persuasiveness. Its getting the audience that deep emotion of people time lag and starving.It goes on to say that anti-science ideology and the failure of the government brought the food crisis in the first place. This paragraph plosive speech sounds a finger to show they are right, as well as preceding to say we have to change if something is not working. In the atomic number 42 article of, The ill of Gene-Altered Crops, Vandana Shiva is presented as the ethos in this paragraph she is the founder of Navdanya in India which is the movement of seed keepers and organic farmers. She write many books on how inheritableally modif y foods are failing and how they will affect us.This grabs the audience attention be eccentric shes a strong truster on organic substance. In the next paragraph it says we need biodiversity intensification that stern work with nature instead of going against it, it doesnt give a specific details as to why. The only argument make was when Doug Gurian-Sherman of the brotherhood of concerned scientist published a studied, Failure to Yield. In the field it is closely evaluated on the genetically modified for 20 years to see if they would increase yield or to just see better progress.In the end it showed that the experiment failed to increase yields as well as it failed to unionise crops to be insect-resistant nor herbicide tolerance. In this paragraph it was use ethos and logos. Ethos was Doug Gurian-Sherman and his research study, Failure to Yield. Logos was the bits of facts that came from Doug Gurian-Sherman research study. In the next to paragraph, it is shown by the world-wi de Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development IAASTD has concluded that genetic engineering did not seem very promising in the future.IAASTD found that the small farms that based on agri-ecology would produce much more food. This paragraph had also ethos, being IAASTD. As for the logos was what IAASTD found in the 4 years on figuring out what genetic engineering could check in the future. The article deems a lot of tactics with logos and ethos to chafe the audience, giving a great amount of facts from other credited people. The next three paragraphs have ethos as well as logos.In the passages, the book, Soil, Not Oil is brought as an example to give that industrial monocultures are more vulnerable to climate changes since the soil kept in organic plants help keep moisture making them less likely to die in draughts. In the next passage it is brought up the false argumentation by genetic engineering industry that its only possible to suffice to climate chan ge with modified food. Vandana Shiva made a statement on crops evolved to be better resilient to climate, as well Vandana has helped get to seeds for drought resistance, and flood resistance as well as salt tolerance. This give the audience the idea that genetically modified food isnt always needed when nature can just evolve.The last two passages gets more in depth on how genetically modified food and organically produced food will take us in the future. The passage give the audience a since of the future that genetic engineer for modified food is a waste a time, it does not give a sense of food security in the future and it will cause small farmers to go dept. As for Vandana Shiva Navdanya, it is a conserving biodiversity that tries to not be wasteful in water at the same time make much more food per acre. The best article that is persuasive is the second article, The Failure of Gene-Altered Crops.The first article was very persuasive, moreover it never made it skillful enough to make it believable that it close to happening. It produce more emotion then logic tactics, making it very hard to obtain whether it is a dream that the nation wishes to reach or something that could be strain for the future. Great syntax on making it very emotional with pathos, but argument stance it would be weak. The first article could have been stronger if it talked about other countries that are already doing genetically modified foods.Korea has been doing genetically modified food for years, about 20 countries including the European Union, Japan, Australia and New Zealand have already a labeling system for genetically modified foods, (Hae-Yeong Kim 132). Another good point would be to bring up Matin Qaim, Vitamin A deficiency is a weighty nutritional problem, causing multiple adverse health outcomes. Simulations for India show that deluxe Rice could reduce related health problems significantly, preventing up to 40,000 child deaths each year. (552)In India Bt cotton f iber has reduce some poverty and actually help small famers, now some in China and South Africa, Bt cotton are a first-generation of genetically modified technology. As for the second argument, many ethos and logos were presented. One being Doug Gurian-Sherman published study on how genetic industries isnt really going anywhither, it has great facts, it was a 4 year study so it showed what was being done in long term. A lot of facts on how genetic industry is failing on making modified food was claimed, but not many on how it could do more harm as well as it would bankrupt some small farmers for even trying to use modified seeds.The plant evolving had a great way point in Gebre Egziabher, Tewolde B( The Use of Genetically limited Crops in Agriculture and Food Production, and Their Impacts on the Environment A ontogenesis World Perspective) Scientists believe that species evolved from a common ancestor through disputation and natural selection. They also believe that changes in gen es occur in all species owing to mutation, with the probability of mutation of each gene remaining unremitting under the same environment.(11) Giving this quote would remind the audience that life has a way of fixing itself and just because the technology is here does not give scientist right to use a different come near but instead try harder to help organic farming when it has been secure food source. Cite American Medical Assoc. Gebre Egziabher T. The Use of Genetically Modified Crops in Agriculture and Food Production, and Their Impacts on the Environment A developing World Perspective. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B, Soil & Plant Science serial online. December 2, 2003538-12. getable from Science & Technology Collection, Ipswich, MA.Accessed April 27, 2012. American Medical Assoc. Hae-Yeong K, Jae-Hwan K, Mi-Hwa O. Regulation and contracting methods for genetically modified foods in Korea. Pure & Applied Chemistry serial online. January 201082(1)129-137. Availab le from Science & Technology Collection, Ipswich, MA.Accessed April 27, 2012. American Medical Assoc. Qaim M. Benefits of genetically modified crops for the unfortunate household income, nutrition, and health. New Biotechnology serial online. November 30, 201027(5)552-557. Available from Science & Technology Collection, Ipswich, MA. Accessed April 27, 2012.