Behavioral And Social Learning Approaches Personality Assessment

spirit can be defined as a hypothetical concept that advert those relatively stable and enduring aspects of an various(prenominal) which distinguishes them from opposite hatful making them unique, notwithstanding which at the same epoch lease a comparison between individual. in that respect argon various approaches that conceptualize record. These argon the psychoanalytic perspective, the trait system, sortist ( come uponing) theory, homoistic theories cognitive and biological approaches. This paper withal entrust explore the bearingal and companionable development theory approaches to genius.The focus will be in comparing and contrastive them and relating them to a personal genius dis instal. The br new(prenominal)ly encyclopedism theory is an approach that argues that we learn done imitation, forming, and observation of other people behavior. If we observe a good behavior from other people, we are likely to dribble well scarcely if we observe detriment al behavior from them we be set out badly. Albert Bandura is considered a major proponent of this theory. This approach also considers the environmental factors claiming they reenforce fashion model.An individual can be fortify directly by a model for example a savant can dress like other to fit in their group. A deuce-ace person can also reinforce modeling. for example a teacher whitethorn praise a real savant making the others to model him. It is also practical to imitate the behavior it egotism. For example a student may play football during his leisure clip influencing another to model the behavior. Social teaching theory argues that bread and thoter and punishment are necessary in acquisition. They work the level at which a person demonstrates a learnt behavior. They argue that deterrent example judgment concerning the right or damage is modeled.Bandura outlined from major condition for modeling to occur paying aid, remembering, ability to twin, and motivati on. imitate leads to acquisition of new behavior, affects the frequency of embarking a learner behavior, encourages a forbidden behavior and increases the frequency of a similar behavior. They punctuate of self regulation in spirit development. For example setting cause goals, self observation, self judgment and self chemical reaction (Ormrod, J. E1999) The behavioral approach in personality estimation argues that personality can be acquired through observation.It put the environment responsible to personality difference among people. It assumes that we can generalize other people by detect how they behave. It also argues that a response to certain stimuli molds behavior. Learning can occur though conditioning in twain valet and non human animals. It also assumes that all human are equal at birth. We are born a tabula rasa empty lucre as we grow, the environmental factors molds our personality. Proponents of this approach allow Skinners (1957) operant condition theor y, Pavlov (1936) conditioning theory and Watson (1958). (Axialis Team 2008)Both the affectionate information and behavioral theories emphasize on observation learning to personality acquisition. They consider environmental factors that influence our personality. They also consider reinforcement and punishment an important factor in learning. However, social learning theory argues that learning is workable without necessarily changing the behavior. This contrast the behavioral approach that argues that learning must be represented by a eternal change in behavior. Social learning assumes people can learn through observation alone and which might not affect their public presentation olibanum may not or may encroachment behavior change.This contrasts the behavioral approach which assumes learning must involve a perm change in behavior as well conditioning necessity in learning. Modeling, imitation and observation cannot be delusive in behavioral acquisition. Environmental facto rs in any case are truly important in personality assessment. These two approaches consider this. They both make a step to explain broader personality to include the animals. On the other hand, we cannot assume the thought processes, unobservable activities, biological and genetic factors in personality assessment and which they assume.Conditioning approach can be effective in explaining how we develop a clothing how we model it, who influence us towards the consumption and how we can stop the habit. In my former(a) stages of life, I used to like toys very much. My set up would make sure that they bought me. Initially, my senior familiar used to like them too. My parents would sully him every time he performed give in school. He would spend time with them on his free time. He motivated my love for toys. When I started going to school, my parents adoptive a similar strategy in dealing me toys.It was not after I destroyed one like before, but after I performed better in sc hool. I remember I had a tall(prenominal) time to adapt to this. previously I mishandled them after all they would buy me if damaged. This time round, it was based on performance. I wasnt a good means but I had to work hard to get just about new toys. If I didnt perform well, the punishment was no toy. As time went by, my performance deteriorated. My parents withdrew their reinforcement. At the long run, there were no more new toys. The old ones were not pleasant at all. I hated them. My performance currently is better but I hate toys.In the behavioral view, I observed the habit from my brother and learnt it, the environmental factors, my parent, influenced me to possess the habit of destroying them in order to be bought some new. I was reinforced to work harder to get new toys. The ban stimulus, the punishment, was not to be bought new toys. The aversive stimulus was my parents sezession of new toys when my performance decreased. I by and by stopped liking toys a run of th e negative reinforcement. In the social learning view, I learnt the habit from observing my brother he used his free time well. My brother was my role model.I paid attention to his habit, I rehearsed and was able to replicate the focussing he handled and treated the toys. However, my parent motivated me by realizing my habit and therefore bought me some more toys. I did not permanently adapt the behavior implying that learning does not necessarily change behavior. Social learning approach best describes my personality I was able to observe, pay attention, rehearse and replicate my brothers behavior thus influencing my personality. I was able to regulate myself in settling my goals, observe and make my own judgment and choose my reaction from my parents move towards my habit.These theories explore the complexity of human nature. Whichever dimension they take as long as it explain personality assessment, is worth credential. However, if these approaches are merged they would have a better explanation to personality assessment. References Ormrod, J. E. (1999). Human learning. Social learning theory Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice-Hall. Retrieved on Friday, October 31, 2008 from http//teachnet. edb. utexas. edu/lynda_abbott/Social. html Axialis team (2008) Psychologist World. Behavioral approach. Retrieved on Friday, October 31, 2008 from http//www. psychologistworld. com/issues/behavioralapproach. php